From A Ham

The question posed by Val from Romania was a common one: If it wasn’t Oswald on the sixth floor, then how did the person who was up there escape?

What was uncommon about his inquiry was the method he used to send it.

Most of the correspondence I receive from readers comes predominately by email, occasionally by telephone, and only rarely by postal carrier. Val’s arrived by way of the 15-meter band, specifically 21.270 MHz at 16:10 hours Zulu.

Wait! It gets better.

As an avid amateur radio operator (aka ham radio), I enjoy dialing through the various HF (high frequency) bands. When I heard his CQ DX transmission (meaning he was searching for long-distance stations), I responded. The normal procedure for each operator is to then check an online call-sign database (every operator world-wide must be licensed) to get details about who it is who answered the CQ. Val was surprised to read my bio, since he had only recently finished my book while sitting in his villa outside Bucharest.

We had a rather nice QSO (conversation), even though there was a lot of QRM (atmospheric interference) between our QTHs (station locations). In the end, Antennahis name and other radio-related information joined the list of contacts penciled into my logbook.

Oh yeah. Back to his question. Not wanting to keep the frequency tied up (and risk possible FCC sanctions), my answer to Val’s question about a fleeing assassin was succinct. But in general, my response was this:

Those who dispute the idea that someone other than Lee Oswald was on the sixth floor often cite for support a collection of statements made by Depository employees saying that no strangers were observed in the building on the morning of the assassination. These statements, amassed by the FBI from 73 men and women who were at work there on November 22, can be found in Commission Exhibit 1381.

Each employee was asked the same handful of rudimentary questions such as, What is your name and age?; Where were you when the shots were fired?; What did you see and do?; and a self-revealing query, Did you see Lee Oswald at the time of the shooting? A final question asked whether the employee had noticed any strangers in the building that day.

All who responded to that last one replied, no.

We must first assume those employees, working away in their enclosed offices or work spaces on multiple floors, were capable of noticing such trespassers, not to mention separating them from the normal business traffic that routinely entered the Depository on any given day.

It also seems obvious from an objective reading of the statements that the overall intent of the FBI agents was not to conduct further investigation, but simply to complete a routine assignment given them by J. Edgar Hoover, who was in turn responding to a request for such information made earlier by the Warren Commission. To Hoover, the ho-hum effort was like everything else in this regard since, in the director’s eyes, the case already had been solved by his agency.

In contrast to the implication that the Depository was secure and immune from interlopers, we have manager William Shelley saying in 1964, “Any one of a thousand different people could have entered or left the building and nobody would have known it.”

We have employee James Jarman telling the HSCA that a stranger could “very easily” have entered the rear of the Depository and made his way to the sixth floor because “…that day the dock door was up and the side door was open.” This same easy access was observed by the Secret Service when an agent arrived there nearly a half hour after the shooting.

It is clear, then, that an unauthorized individual had the means to enter the building unnoticed and make his way to a higher floor. Let’s say someone did. How then could he have escaped?

Defenders of the Warren Report are quick to point out that if Vicki Adams didn’t hear Oswald on the stairs, then why didn’t she hear the assassin who replaced him?

The error in their logic is glaringly obvious, for the question presupposes that any other shooter would have made his escape down the stairs at the exact same time Oswald was to have done so. But this person would not necessarily have had to come down the stairs when Oswald supposedly did.

The timing of Oswald’s escape from the sixth floor was based on a speed that would get him to the second-floor lunchroom in advance of when Marrion Baker and Roy Truly saw him there. That time frame was established at under 90 seconds, a figure resulting from on-site tests duplicating the actions of an Oswald stand-in, and both Baker and Truly. Oswald had to get to the lunchroom before they did, which therefore put him on the stairs at a specific time.

The fact Victoria Adams was on those stairs at the same time was the thorn in the Commission’s side.

But if someone other than Oswald was on the sixth floor, his escape would not have been governed by any such time constraints. He could have come down later, since the sixth floor remained vacant and was not searched for some 35 minutes after the assassination. (This, oddly enough, even though that floor was pointed out almost immediately as the source of the shots.)

Uniformed cops, plain-clothes cops, the news media, workers and others were swarming throughout the Depository in the meantime. The delay in searching the sixth floor would have provided plenty of opportunity for someone to depart in the confusion. Unlikely as it sounds, this person might even have remained on the sixth floor and then blended in with those who eventually arrived there.

The point is, alternatives exist and should not be readily dismissed.

73 (best regards)!

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

3 responses to “From A Ham

  1. mccrguy

    Love ur precise clarifications….its amaxing thst the building was still a half he after the shooting still so really open and unsecured

  2. steve kasarsky

    I am hoping this comment gets to Mr. Ernest. Currently reading Girl on Stairs. Great read. One thing that always disturbed was why did Mrs. Reid tell FBI Oswald exited TSBD wearing “SHIRT SLEEVES”. Could it be that she was adamant to agents that he wore only a white T-shirt but since Mrs. Bledsoe saw him on bus in long-sleeve flannel shirt Agents seduced her to see if she could live with “SHIRT SLEEVES”. Also, why was no question asked as to whether she saw Oswald holding anything as he exited like….a rifle, a bag, a jacket, a flannel shirt? This could bolster the 2 Oswald theory, which I firmly stand by. Also, I am quite sure I know the identity of the Dark Complexioned Mystery Man who sat next to Umbrella Man and was the man with his rt. hand raised as JFK was being shot. He was a neighbor of mine from the 60’s where we lived in Chester, Pa. Albert Osborne erroneously told agents in 1964 that he was born in Chester, Pa. His name was Thomas Joseph Rossi. He was a true Kennedy hater. I have written a manuscript about this. I only came across this when I saw his photo in “Crossfire” By Jim Marrs in the 90’s. Although Rossi told me after the assassination that he was there when Kennedy “got his”. Never gave this man another thought until I saw his picture in several photos from Dealey Plaza. I have given the FBI my manuscript and followed up with several letters to the Director, but they refuse to respond. I worked for the FBI from 1970-1983 as a Latent Fingerprint Specialist. I am hoping someone could help me do some more research on Rossi since FBI seems not to care about trying to find truth……Stephen J. Kasarsky (662)988-3145

  3. Billy

    Mr. Ernest, I have only now become aware of your research into Miss Adams, and I want to say that I am looking forward to reading more about it. I listened to you talk for about an hour about your book and your conclusions. So I dug around and found your website and came across this particular entry from over 2 years ago.

    You said, “Uniformed cops, plain-clothes cops, the news media, workers and others were swarming throughout the Depository in the meantime.” This was your last paragraph. This is quite an interesting topic… because I would like to expand on it.

    You wonder about younger researchers, and I would guess that I would be such a person. Well, here is the topic that my pen is itching to write about. Who was in that building? Where were they? And what were they doing in there? There’s a lot of evidence that is purportedly coming from the TSBD, from either the eyewitnesses inside or the physical evidence gathered there.

    And as you hinted above, there was a lot of activity that day. There’s easily a book’s worth of information that could be presented with these topics:
    1. List of people who entered the TSBD and what they did.
    2. Timeline of the events, including entries and exits of the people there.
    3. Cross-referencing the witness reports with the physical evidence that is in the National Archives.

    I think such a book would conclude the same 4 things you did in your speech, the last of which being that a regular citizen cannot find out the truth in the face of the government’s obfuscations, obstructions, incompetence, fabrications, and culpability in the assassination and the investigation. If we know anything 50 years on, it is that a pigeon hole works great to house a stool pigeon, but not for justice.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s